Institutional Value Chains in the International Economy JEL: D46; F23; F6; K33 УДК: 339.94; 334.75

Main Article Content

Ruslan Alexandrovich Samsonov

Abstract

In most studies of global value chains (GVCDS), the emphasis is mainly on the study of technological, productionand trade relations, leaving the institutional aspects of such interactions at the periphery of scientific analysis asexogenous factors on the principle of «ceteris paribus.» Moreover, the achievements of various areas of moderninstitutional economic theory show the superficiality and limitation of approaches that do not take into accountinstitutional factors, which ultimately cannot offer constructive, and most importantly, real proposals for solvingthe problems of strategic development of domestic enterprises within the framework of the GVCDS.Based on the theorem of R. Coase and its macroeconomic statement by T. Eggertsohn, a global approach isformulated that interprets its basic principles and mechanisms from the standpoint of the participation of economicentities in the NCCA. At the same time, the global economy is very heterogeneous in its structure and dynamics,fragmented into regional and organizational blocks with its own «rules of the game» norms and greatly differentiatedin terms of transaction costs and business conditions. On this basis, a hypothesis is being developed, accordingto which the role of institutional factors, manifested in the form of distribution of power and property rights,implementation of international law and the activities of international organizations, is, in fact, very significant inthe formation of the competitive advantages of enterprises within the framework of the GCCDS.It is concluded that the participation of business entities in the GVCDS contributes to intensive economic growth,provided that a balanced private-state partnership is achieved in the country to ensure an effective institutionaland transactional infrastructure at the international level.

Article Details

How to Cite
Institutional Value Chains in the International Economy: JEL: D46; F23; F6; K33 УДК: 339.94; 334.75. (2019). Управление современной организацией: опыт, проблемы и перспективы, 10, 23-33. http://new.journal.asu.ru/mmo/article/view/7044
Section
Управление организацией в пространственной экономике

How to Cite

Institutional Value Chains in the International Economy: JEL: D46; F23; F6; K33 УДК: 339.94; 334.75. (2019). Управление современной организацией: опыт, проблемы и перспективы, 10, 23-33. http://new.journal.asu.ru/mmo/article/view/7044

References

Каплински Р. (2003). Распространение положительного влияния глобализации: анализ «цепочек» прираще-
ния стоимости // Вопросы экономики. № 10. С. 4–26. [Kaplinski, R. (2003). Distribution of the positive
impact of globalization: analysis of the «chains» of value increment. Issues of Economics, No. 10, pp. 4–26.
(In Russian)].
Катькало В. С. (2008). Эволюция теории стратегического управления. СПб.: Высшая школа менеджмен-
та. 548 с. [Katkalo, V. S. (2008) The evolution of strategic management theory. SPb.: Graduate School of
Management, 548 p. (In Russian)].
Менар К. (2005). Экономика трансакционных издержек: от теоремы Коуза до эмпирических исследований //
Институциональная экономика / Под общ. ред. А. Олейника. М.: ИНФРА-М. С. 128–131. [Menard, K.
(2005) Economics of transaction costs: from Coase’s theorem to empirical research. Institutional Economics /
Ed. ed. A. Oleinik. M.: INFRA-M, pp. 128–131. (In Russian)].
Самсонов Р. А., Бочаров С. Н. (2018). Ответственность стейкхолдеров при формировании глобальных цепо-
чек создания добавленной стоимости // Управленец. Т. 9, № 4. С. 53–65. [Samsonov, R. A., Bocharov,
S. N. (2018). Responsibility of stakeholders in the formation of global value chains. Manager, T. 9, No. 4,
pp. 53–65. (In Russian)]. DOI: 10.29141 / 22185003–2018–9–4–6.
Симачев Ю. В., Данильцев А. В., Федюнина А. А., Глазатова М. К., Кузык М. Г., Зудин Н. Н. (2019). Россия в ме-
няющихся условиях мировой торговли: структурный взгляд на новое позиционирование // Вопро-
сы экономики. № 8. С. 5–29. [Simachev, Yu.V., Daniltsev, A. V., Fedyunina, A. A., Glazatova, M. K., Kuzyk,
M. G., Zudin, N. N. (2019). Russia in the changing conditions of world trade: a structural view of the new
positioning. Issues of Economics, No. 8, pp. 5–29. (In Russian)].
Уильямсон О. И. (1996). Экономические институты капитализма: Фирмы, рынки, «отношенческая» кон-
трактация. СПб.: Лениздат. 702 с. [Williamson, O. I. (1996). Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms,
Markets, «Relational» Contracting. SPb.: Lenizdat, 702 p. (In Russian)].
Buchanan, J. (1994). Choosing What to Choose. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150 (1), pp. 123–
135.
Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1–44.
Dyer, J. H., Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational
Competitive Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), pp. 660–679. DOI: 10.2307/259056.
Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 385 p.
Global Value Chain Development Report 2017: Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of GVCs on Economic Development.
Washington, DC: World Bank. 189 p.
Global Value Chain Development Report 2019: Technological innovation, Supply, Chain Trade, and Workers in a
Globalized World. Washington, DC: World Bank. 186 p.
Stigler G. J. (1966). The Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan. 355 p.
The 2018 IPRI–International Property Rights Index Full Report. The Property Rights Alliance. 66 p.