THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES OF SOME SAMBUCUS L. SPECIES

Authors

  • Любовь (Lyubov') Николаевна (Nikolaevna) Скрыпник (Skrypnik) Baltic Federal University. I. Kant http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6280-1194
  • Алина (Alina) Андреевна (Andreevna) Курашова (Kurashova) Baltic Federal University. I. Kant

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.2019014037

Keywords:

antioxidants, anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, Sambucus nigra L., Sambucus racemosa L., Sambucus ebulus L.

Abstract

The antioxidant properties of fruits, flowers, leaves, bark (or stem) of elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.), red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa L.) and dwarf elder (Sambucus ebulus L.) were investigated. The total content of anthocyanins and total phenolic compounds content by using of Folin-Ciocalteu assay were determined spectrophotometrically. The total content of water-soluble antioxidants was investigated by amperometric method. The antioxidant activity (AOA) of plant extracts was measured using DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical, ABTS (2,2’azinobis(3)ethylbenzthiazoline-6- sulfonic acid) radical and FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) assays. It was established that the fruits of plants of the genus Sambucus L. were characterized by the maximum level of all studied antioxidants. High content of anthocyanins and phenolic compounds was determined in the leaves of elderberry and dwarf elder. The flowers of these elderberry species were distinguished by a high total content of water-soluble antioxidants. The highest antioxidant activity was observed in fruits extracts in comparison with other parts of the plant. Higher antioxidant activity was identified in the extract of the fruits of elderberry and dwarf elder than of the red elderberry fruits. The most optimal method for evaluating the antioxidant activity of elder extracts was the FRAP assay, which showed the highest correlation between AOA and individual antioxidant components, compared to DPPH and ABTS assays. Comparative analysis of antioxidant content and antioxidant activity of various plant parts of three elderberry species showed that the most promising sources of biologically active substances with antioxidant properties are fruits and flowers of elderberry and dwarf elder.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Любовь (Lyubov') Николаевна (Nikolaevna) Скрыпник (Skrypnik), Baltic Federal University. I. Kant

    доцент института живых систем

  • Алина (Alina) Андреевна (Andreevna) Курашова (Kurashova), Baltic Federal University. I. Kant

    студент

References

1. Eriksson T., Donoghue M.J. Systematic Botany, 1997, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 555–573, DOI: 10.2307/2419828.
2. Jacobs B., Huysmans S., Smets E. Taxon., 2010, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 850–866.
3. Gostishchev D.A., Deyneka V.I., Sorokopudov V.N., Voloshchenko L.V., Shirina L.S., Rybitskiy S.M. Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Meditsina. Farmatsiya, 2011, vol. 15, no. 16, pp. 261–266. (in Russ.).
4. Voloshchenko L.V. Selektsionnaya otsenka iskhodnogo materiala buziny chernoy (Sambucus nigra L.) v usloviyakh yugo-zapada TSCHR: dis. ... kand. s.-kh. nauk. [Selection evaluation of the source material of the black elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) in the conditions of the south-west of the Central Black Earth Region: dis. ... Candidate of Agricul-tural Sciences]. Ramon', 2015, 124 p. (in Russ.).
5. Yakhudin R., Karomatov I.D. Biologiya i integra-tivnaya meditsina, 2016, no. 4, pp. 36–44. (in Russ.).
6. Vandyshev V.V., Pavlova M.Ye., Serdechnaya O.I., Miroshnikova Ye.A., Surkov V.A. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Agronomiya i zhivotnovodstvo, 2013, no. 3, pp. 13–21. (in Russ.).
7. Tatvidze M., Aleko K. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya, 2013, no. 4, pp. 265–267, DOI: 10.14258/jcprm.1304265. (in Russ.).
8. Vrchotová N., Dadáková E., Matějíček A., Tříska J., Kaplan J. Natural product research, 2017, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 700–703, DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1214826.
9. Viapiana A., Wesolowski M. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2017, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 82–87, DOI: 10.1007/s11130-016-0594-x.
10. Senica M., Stampar F., Veberic R., Mikulic-Petkovsek M. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 72, pp. 182–188, DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.04.056.
11. Sidor A., Gramza-Michałowska A. Journal of functional foods, 2015, vol. 18, pp. 941–958, DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2014.07.012.
12. Mikulic-Petkovsek M., Samoticha J., Eler K., Stampar F., Veberic R. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2015, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1477–1487, DOI: 10.1021/jf506005b.
13. Dzhafarova R.E., Zul'fugarova M.B., Dzhavadova G.Ch. Vestnik Rossiyskoy voyenno-meditsinskoy akademii, 2017, no. 1, pp. 124–128. (in Russ.).
14. Losey R.J., Stenholm N., Whereat-Phillips P., Vallianatos H. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2003, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 695–707, DOI: 10.1016/S0305-4403(02)00242-X.
15. Tasinov O., Kiselova-Kaneva Y., Ivanova D. Scripta Scientifica Medica, 2013, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 36–42, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3990.2167.
16. Shokrzadeh M., Saravi S.S. Journal of medicinal plants research, 2010, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 95–103, DOI: 10.5897/JMPR09.026.
17. Mikulic-Petkovsek M., Ivancic A., Todorovic B., Veberic R., Stampar F. Journal of food science, 2015, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 2180–2190. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13008.
18. Zul'fugarova M.B., Novruzov E.N. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya, 2017, no. 1, pp. 163–167, DOI: 10.14258/jcprm.2017011422.19 (in Russ.).
19. Mikulic-Petkovsek M., Schmitzer V., Slatnar A., Todorovic B., Veberic R., Stampar F., Ivancic A. Journal of agricul-tural and food chemistry, 2014, vol. 62, no. 24, pp. 5573–5580, DOI: 10.1021/jf5011947.
20. Jabbari M., Daneshfard B., Emtiazy M., Khiveh A., Hashempur M.H. Journal of evidence-based complementary & al-ternative medicine, 2017, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 996–1001, DOI: 10.1177/2156587217701322.
21. Bubulica M.V., Chirigiu L., Popescu M., Simionescu A., Anoaica G., Popescu A. Chemistry of natural compounds, 2012, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 520–521.
22. Pieri V., Schwaiger S., Ellmerer E.P., Stuppner H. Journal of natural products, 2009, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1798–1803, DOI: 10.1021/np900373u.
23. Rajendran P., Nandakumar N., Rengarajan T., Palaniswami R., Gnanadhas E.N., Lakshminarasaiah U., Gopas J., Nish-igaki I. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2014, vol. 436, pp. 332–347, DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.06.004.
24. Lima G.P.P., Vianello F., Corrêa C.R., Campos R.A.D.S., Borguini M.G. Food and nutrition sciences, 2014, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1065–1082. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2014.511117.
25. Olas B. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2018, vol. 9, article 78, DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00078.
26. Chupakhina G.N., Maslennikov P.V., Skrypnik L.N., Chupakhina N.Yu., Fedurayev P.V. Antioksidantnyye svoystva kul'turnykh rasteniy Kaliningradskoy oblasti: monografiya. [Antioxidant properties of cultivated plants of the Kalinin-grad region: monograph]. Kaliningrad, 2016, 145 p. (in Russ.).
27. Denisenko T.A., Vishnikin A.B., Tsyganok L.P. Analitika i kontrol', 2015, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 373–380. DOI: 10.15826/analitika.2015.19.4.012. (in Russ.).
28. Yashin A.Y. Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 2008, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 2566–2571, DOI: 10.1134/S1070363208120360.
29. Tõnutare T. Possibilities to Affect Antioxidant Properties of Strawberries and Some Methodical Aspects in Their Deter-mination: A Thesis for applying for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Agriculture, Estonian University of Life Sci-ences. Tartu, 2015. 152 p.
30. Taneva I., Petkova N., Dimov I., Ivanov I., Denev P. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 2016, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 35–38.
31. Khasanov V.V., Ryzhova G.L., Mal'tseva Ye.V. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya, 2004, no. 3, pp. 63–75. (in Russ.).
32. Zaprometov M.N. Fenol'nyye soyedineniya: rasprostraneniye, metabolizm i funktsii v rasteniyakh. [Phenolic com-pounds: distribution, metabolism and function in plants]. Moscow, 1993, 185 p. (in Russ.).
33. Yousuf B., Gul K., Wani A.A., Singh P. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2016, vol. 56, no. 13, pp. 2223–2230, DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2013.805316.
34. Deyneka V.I., Kul'chenko Ya.Yu., Blinova I.P., Chulkov A.N., Deyneka L.A. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya, 2018, no. 1, pp. 129–135. DOI: 10.14258/jcprm.2018013296. (in Russ.).
35. Boligon A.A., Machado M.M., Athayde M.L. Medicinal chemistry, 2014, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 517–522, DOI: 10.4172/2161-0444.1000188.
36. Pokorna J., Venskutonis P.R., Kraujalyte V., Kraujalis P., Dvořák P., Tremlova B., Kopřiva V., Ošťádalová M. Acta al-imentaria, 2015, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 454–460, DOI: 10.1556/066.2015.44.0017.
37. Huang D., Ou B., Prior R.L. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2005, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1841–1856, DOI: 10.1021/jf030723c.
Содержание антоцианов

Downloads

Published

2019-03-06

Issue

Section

Low-molecular weight compounds

How to Cite

[1]
2019. THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIOXIDANT PROPERTIES OF SOME SAMBUCUS L. SPECIES. chemistry of plant raw material. 1 (Mar. 2019), 127–137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14258/jcprm.2019014037.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 488

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.